We made it through Day 2 of the AIGA Leadership Retreat, our first full day in sessions. And a LONG day it was! Where as yesterday it was emotionally overwhelming to be a part of something like this and be here with so many talented people, today was filled with so much engaging discussion that it was intellectually overwhelming!
In the morning we started with a general assembly in the ballroom, where Executive Director Ric Grefe talked about the strategic and tacitcal challenges we as AIGA face. He made a great point in that this retreat is really an opportunity for the national board and staff to listen to local chapters and be transparent in the changes and mandates being put forth this weekend. The course adjustments being proposed are based on feedback that each chapter has received as well as feedback to the national board, and this year's retreat is about discussing those findings, determining the best course of action, and taking the necessary steps to move forward. He also emphasized the point that we must move forward together in order to be successful and fruitful in the long term.
• We need to acheive the strength of diversity. We need to do more to not only embrace minorities and support them in their careers, we need to embrace a diversity of disciplines and practices as well as diversify our offerings and become a valuable resource available to designers whoever they are and wherever they are.
• We need to address the principal member service issues, and enact programs to establish things like free events for our members, embracing the need for more small group discussion events and facilitating those conversations, and making sure our members (especially new members) are welcomed, engaged, and included in events and discussions.
• We need to offer more programming that members have identified as valuable. Throughout the surveys and roundtables there has been consistent desires for more learning and training type programs, small group discussions and open forums, blogs and opportunities for member contributed content, embracing other disciplines and mediums, and doing more to educate our local industries about the value of design in business.
• And finally we must deal with the perception that AIGA and local chapters are cliques or elitist, and find ways to break down those preconceived notions. This is something that Idaho as a chapter has faced and that I feel is incredibly important to address.
We then outlined the priorities in implementing these new programs by 2014:
1. We must continue to work on developing AIGA and chapter sites as a central place of information and a portal.
2. We must have clearly outlined benefits of membership, including the tangible and intangible. In the current state of the economy the concern about "what's in it for me?" is becoming more and more present, and we need to work harder at making sure those benefits are known, what our membership dues go towards, as well as what sort of programs and initiatives AIGA is involved in that benefit society.
3. We need to increase resources to the website(s) that provide for co-creation of content and broad distribution. There were many comments made that AIGA is behind when it comes to social media and social networking integration, which I also agree with but understand that there are higher priorities in the grand scheme of things. The new mandate has much emphasis on user generated content and member contribution, something that we at AIGA Idaho have been planning and preparing for as well.
4. AIGA must project a tone that is engaging to young designers. We need to reach out to younger designers who increasingly have the desire to contribute, be heard, and have the opportunity to voice their opinions and wishes. They are our future and we need to meet them and engage them where they are on the web and out in the world.
For more info please read AIGA's official position on spec work and Executive Director Ric Grefe's follow up article on spec work and ethical standards. Please contribute to the discussion by leaving comments on one or both. AIGA Idaho will be putting together programming to help educate Idaho designers on the issue of spec work and clarify our position and the risks involved, as well as providing an opportunity for active discussion , so watch for that in the coming months.
As for the rest of the group, I'll let them elaborate on their breakout topics when they get a chance.
After the Convention tomorrow we will be developing action plans to put everything we've learned and the ideas we've had into motion, and we'll be posting that soon to the blog and the Retreat resource mini-site that will come. Exciting things are happening, so be prepared for some big changes around the AIGA Idaho house! As for me, once again I've slipped into a sleepy stupor and must head off. Until tomorrow, good night.
Posted by System in 2009 Leadership Retreat | June 6, 2009
Post a CommentWhen you don't know when the next job will come spec work can begin to seem like an option. I've been tempted many times. I haven't yet as I can see how that is not a precedent we should be setting, and those that do spec work are not helping our cause. That said, when money is tight and you need to eat, I can fully understand trying spec work.
Posted by: Clayton on June 6, 2009
That's a great point Clayton, and I fully understand that position. As an organization AIGA makes it clear first and foremost that designers should have the freedom of choice to participate in spec practices, and we aim to provide resources and support to help designers make a responsible, well educated decision when confronted with the situation of spec. However we also need to discuss the possible pros of spec, such as what you've brought up and when it's involved in pitching business. Spec is a tremendously gray area, and there will probably never be a black and white decision. Regardless, it's important to continue having discussions about it while understanding that officially AIGA does not support designers doing work without knowing whether they will be compensated, we do not support speculative design.
Posted by: Ryan on June 6, 2009
Spec work is not good. If you feel the urge–try to produce work or a project for yourself that expresses the ideas that you have. Many designers and developers go this avenue and next thing you know that have a fancy little startup that is acquired by Google 6 months later. Okay, not every project becomes the Cinderella story, but this is a great way to explore ideas without producing spec work specific for a client/project/RFP.
Posted by: Justin K on June 7, 2009